Publishers
AI takes your articles. You set the terms
Measure first, set policy based on the numbers, and get paid for what sells.
Publishers
Measure first, set policy based on the numbers, and get paid for what sells.
What publishers face
Page views from people are not growing, while AI bot requests keep climbing and so do server costs.
Many bots ignore robots.txt, and blocking everything also turns away the companies that want to pay.
Bot share and the most-taken articles are only estimates, so there is no basis for policy.
How it works
We measure citations in AI answers from the outside and, if you want, monitor bot traffic. Nothing is charged or blocked during this period.
Based on the results, you decide per bot whether to allow, charge or block, how long the preview is, and what is for sale.
We sell article access and APIs to AI and data companies that want to buy properly.
You are paid for what is sold. Every transaction can be checked line by line in the console.
Your controls
Choose free access, charging or blocking for each bot operator. Search engine bots always pass for free.
See NanoTrans Edge →Choose which years and sections are for sale, and which articles to exclude.
See sales, revenue split and upcoming settlements, and drill into any figure on a statement down to the transaction.
Search engine bots pass for free at every stage.
Articles restricted from third-party use are not offered for sale, APIs or licenses.
The revenue share and payment cycle are agreed with each publisher based on pilot results.
Yes. NanoTrans Index measures from the outside without publisher integration, and is being built to work independently of Edge.